![]() ![]() The purpose is neither to oppose nor to diminish select methodologies instead, it is to suggest a complimentary suite of qualitative and quantitative approaches to better investigate social issues.Īs qualitative research has found broad acceptance within the IS community, the methodological discourse has turned its attention to questions concerning the quality of qualitative research mostly emphasizing the development of how-to guidelines for good practice. They conclude with the need to refocus on the usefulness of qualitative research and offer an evolving set of criteria for conducting policy-related research. The authors present the limitations of qualitative research these limitations have historically been the justifications used by individuals to discount the use of qualitative research for policy studies. In this paper, the authors acknowledge previous examinations, and also intend to create a new discourse. ![]() Yet, such exchanges routinely ignore the unique ways in which qualitative research can inform policy. Scholars, using diverse epistemological and ontological stances, have contested different beliefs about the criteria for judgment of rigorous research. For decades, qualitative and quantitative methodologists have debated the merits of one perspective in relation to others. This paper examines the relationship between qualitative research and public policy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |